RANK 1: THE POLITICIAN HAS PREVIOUSLY VOTED FOR PRO-EMS LEGISLATION, HAS MADE REGULAR PRO-EMS STATEMNENTS, AND IN GENERAL HAS EXPRESSED WILLINGNESS TO VOTE FOR PRO HEALTH/ SAFEFETY/ WELLNESS & PAY BENEFIT PARITY LEGISLATION FOR FDNY EMS AND FDNY FF. SHOULD BE ENDORSED BY THE LOBBY AND MEMBERS SHOULD BE EDUCATED ON THIER PRO EMS STANCE.
RANK 2: THE POLITICIAN HAS PREVIOUSLY MADE REGULAR PRO-EMS STATEMNENTS, IS EASY TO ENAGAGE WITH AND APPEARS OPEN MINDED TO PRO HEALTH/ SAFEFETY/ WELLNESS & PAY BENEFIT PARITY LEGISLSATION FOR FDNY EMS AND FDNY FF.
RANK 3: POLTICIAN IS NEUTRAL ON THE ISSUE MAKING NO PUBLIC STATEMENTS ON THE SUBJECT ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.
RANK 4: POLTICIAN IS HARD TO REACH AND OR APPEARS STANDOFFISH TO THE SUBJECT OF PRO EMS LEGISLATION.
RANK 5: POLTICIAN IS HARD TO REACH AND APPEARS HOSTILE TO PRO EMS LEGISLATION SHOULD BE VOTED OUT OF OFFICE AS EARLIEST POSSIBLE TIME NO MATTER WHO IS RUNNING AGAINST THEM.