RANK 1: THE POLITICIAN HAS PREVIOUSLY VOTED FOR PRO-EMS LEGISLATION, HAS MADE REGULAR PRO-EMS STATEMENTS, AND IN GENERAL HAS EXPRESSED WILLINGNESS TO VOTE FOR PRO HEALTH/ SAFEFETY/ WELLNESS & PAY BENEFIT PARITY LEGISLATION FOR FDNY EMS AND FDNY FF. SHOULD BE ENDORSED BY THE LOBBY, AND MEMBERS SHOULD BE EDUCATED ON THEIR PRO-EMS STANCE.
RANK 2: THE POLITICIAN HAS PREVIOUSLY MADE REGULAR PRO-EMS STATEMNENTS, IS EASY TO ENAGAGE WITH AND APPEARS OPEN MINDED TO PRO HEALTH/ SAFEFETY/ WELLNESS & PAY BENEFIT PARITY LEGISLSATION FOR FDNY EMS AND FDNY FF.
RANK 3: POLITICIAN IS NEUTRAL ON THE ISSUE, MAKING NO PUBLIC STATEMENTS ON THE SUBJECT ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.
RANK 4: POLITICIAN IS HARD TO REACH AND/OR APPEARS STANDOFFISH TO THE SUBJECT OF PRO EMS LEGISLATION.
RANK 5: POLITICIAN IS VERY HARD TO REACH AND APPEARS HOSTILE TO PRO-EMS LEGISLATION. SHOULD BE VOTED OUT OF OFFICE AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE TIME – NO MATTER WHO IS RUNNING AGAINST THEM.
